How to design a Corporate AI Strategy for Measurable ROI

thumb

A staggering 70-85% of AI projects deliver zero ROI. The reason isn't technology; it's a failure to understand the human side of transformation.

Gaurav K. Verma 7 mins read Sun Jun 29 2025
Sun Jun 29 2025

The Curious Club

Let your network know that you read what
top 1% reads.

Share on social media
Audio Summary

Why 85% of AI Projects Fail and How to Build a Winning Strategy

0:00
0:00

Despite a projected $4.4 trillion opportunity, the corporate world's AI gold rush is a bust. While executives pour capital into AI, a staggering 70% to 85% of projects fail to deliver any return on investment [1, 2]. This is not a minor shortfall; it's a systemic crisis of wasted capital.

The failure rate is accelerating, with the share of businesses scrapping their AI initiatives doubling in just one year [3]. For founders, investors, and corporate strategists, this represents a critical, multi-billion dollar blind spot.

The Rise of "Pilot Purgatory"

This has created "Pilot Purgatory," a graveyard for promising AI proofs-of-concept that die before scaling. While companies can prove an algorithm works in a lab, few projects escape the pilot stage, with an 88% failure rate when moving from prototype to production [4, 5].

This leads to the single most important question facing any leader in 2025: Why do up to 85% of corporate AI projects fail to deliver any financial value, and how can you design a strategy that guarantees it won't happen to you?


The Common Misdiagnosis: Blaming the Machines

Conventional wisdom blames technical obstacles: poor data, immature algorithms, or infrastructure bottlenecks. While these challenges are real, they are symptoms, not the root cause. Treating them leads to a costly cycle of failure because it ignores the actual problem. The greatest barrier to AI ROI isn't technical; it's the people, culture, and leadership.

The Real Root Cause: The 70/20/10 Rule

A forensic analysis of "AI Leaders"—the 26% of companies that consistently succeed—reveals a different philosophy [6]. They intuitively understand the 70/20/10 Rule, a framework identified by Boston Consulting Group that shows where winning organizations focus their efforts:

  • People and Process Transformation 70%
  • Technology and Data Infrastructure 20%
  • Algorithms and Models 10%

This distribution proves the AI ROI problem is overwhelmingly a change management, not a technology, issue. Companies fail because they neglect the essential work of re-engineering processes, retraining staff, and rewiring culture. They buy the engine but fail to build the rest of the car.

The Pivot: The True Cost of a Flawed Strategy

This misdiagnosis has a dangerous consequence: leaders use financial models blind to the most significant risks. A traditional ROI calculation is dangerously incomplete, ignoring the massive liabilities of a poorly governed AI strategy.

To design an approach that guarantees a return, you must first learn to count the real costs.

What is the financial risk of a single EU AI Act violation? How do you model the cost of employee resistance? How do you place a dollar value on the flexibility to abandon a failing pilot?

The answers aren't in a tech manual. They're in a new playbook for strategy, finance, and leadership that treats AI as a core business transformation.

You've seen the problem. The section below reveals the solution. Continue reading to access the premium deep-dive analysis.

Log in to read the full article


Lets take a deeper dive


Lets talk data

An infoGraphics presented by Curious Monky

The Curious Club

Let your network know that you read what
top 1% reads.

Share on social media
How to design a Corporate AI Strategy for Measurable ROI